I have no words. *le sigh
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
limerence
I think most people I know have directly or indirectly experienced limerence, or, infatuation. I was quite pleased to find out, that rather than being a bizzare freak of nature, my expereince has completely correlated with extensive studies on the matter (thanks Wikipedia!):
Limerence is a cognitive and emotional state of being infatuated or obsessed with another person, typically experienced involuntarily and characterized by a strong desire for reciprocation of one's feelings but not primarily for a sexual relationship (although it can further intensify the situation).
Although the direction of feeling, i.e. happy versus unhappy, shifts rapidly, the intensity of intrusive and involuntary thinking alters less rapidly, and alters only in response to an accumulation of experiences with the particular limerent object.
Limerence develops and is sustained when there is a certain balance of hope and uncertainty. The base for limerent hope is not in objective reality but reality as it is perceived. The inclination is to sift through nuances of speech and subtleties of behavior for evidence of limerent hope. "Little things" are noticed and endlessly analyzed for meaning.
The belief that the limerent object does not and will not reciprocate can only come about with great difficulty. Limerence can be carried quite far before acknowledgment of rejection is genuine, especially if it has not been addressed openly by the object of limerence.
The average limerent reaction duration, from the moment of initiation until a feeling of neutrality is reached, is approximately three years. The extremes may be as brief as a few weeks or as long as several decades.
Limerence generally lasts about four months, but further studies on unrequited limerence have suggested longer durations.
Great. I’ve wasted at least this long experiencing unrequited limerence perpetuated by a party who consistently leveraged this (obvious or insinuated) weakness to his own end and maintained the perfect balance of hope and uncertainty. I can’t time travel to January 2010 to erase these accumulated experiences, but I can finally face an objective reality (that he is a fucking idiot), to ensure I no longer experience this secret shame. Hopefully knowledge is power, because I think I have somewhat of an addictive personality with a propensity for limerence. I’m embracing neutrality and eschewing mercy.
Limerence is a cognitive and emotional state of being infatuated or obsessed with another person, typically experienced involuntarily and characterized by a strong desire for reciprocation of one's feelings but not primarily for a sexual relationship (although it can further intensify the situation).
Although the direction of feeling, i.e. happy versus unhappy, shifts rapidly, the intensity of intrusive and involuntary thinking alters less rapidly, and alters only in response to an accumulation of experiences with the particular limerent object.
Limerence develops and is sustained when there is a certain balance of hope and uncertainty. The base for limerent hope is not in objective reality but reality as it is perceived. The inclination is to sift through nuances of speech and subtleties of behavior for evidence of limerent hope. "Little things" are noticed and endlessly analyzed for meaning.
The belief that the limerent object does not and will not reciprocate can only come about with great difficulty. Limerence can be carried quite far before acknowledgment of rejection is genuine, especially if it has not been addressed openly by the object of limerence.
The average limerent reaction duration, from the moment of initiation until a feeling of neutrality is reached, is approximately three years. The extremes may be as brief as a few weeks or as long as several decades.
Limerence generally lasts about four months, but further studies on unrequited limerence have suggested longer durations.
Great. I’ve wasted at least this long experiencing unrequited limerence perpetuated by a party who consistently leveraged this (obvious or insinuated) weakness to his own end and maintained the perfect balance of hope and uncertainty. I can’t time travel to January 2010 to erase these accumulated experiences, but I can finally face an objective reality (that he is a fucking idiot), to ensure I no longer experience this secret shame. Hopefully knowledge is power, because I think I have somewhat of an addictive personality with a propensity for limerence. I’m embracing neutrality and eschewing mercy.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
just because you can, doesn't mean you should...
Sacré bleu! Half way through October and I haven’t written. There's been work and sleeping, and in between, shopping, procrastinating on ‘chores’ I should be doing, and finding distractions both bad and good. Perhaps I need a new hobby other than screwing, drinking and writing (which, obviously, has been the lesser of the three lately). However whilst living life, I have learned some important lessons:
- Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. This means screwing other people over, or screwing over yourself inadvertently by screwing other people.
- Sometimes we are seeking the attention without knowing it, and without knowing why. That’s why you keep screwing the people who screw you over. You can only prove the other person right by losing your dignity.
- Sometimes the ‘why’ is something that you may never get. Whether that’s acknowledgement of some type of relationship (the recognition that, yes, you get together and talk occasionally and he considers you his confidante), the need to be the centre of someone’s world, or just the knowledge you could have the companionship if you wanted to, (on a Sunday morning, without warning, with pancakes, and a nice movie and maybe some sex).
- Sometimes the ‘why’ is something you think you want, but once you get it you might realize you don’t. It’s a scary place to be. What if you get what you want and hate it?
- Many ‘people’ (I’m not going to single out men here…), have lived their lives doing what they do and getting what they get by manipulating others so they don’t have to do it themselves. If you continue to do these things for them, you’re officially their bitch. Don’t do these things for these people anymore. In a nice way. Remember, you are #1.
- If people are pissing you off, just stop talking and stare at them intently and let them babble on until they realize how stupid they are, or until some other, more aggressive person decides to die on that hill. This is Michael Corelone style. And it works, I’ve tried it.
- Saying no sometimes makes other people realize why they need to step up their game. A half-assed request shouldn’t always get a yes. Saying no lets you keep your dignity and ensures you’re not just someone to rely on when it’s convenient. If they’re really invested you and not just the first person who says yes, they’ll ask again.
If life’s a game, I want to learn the rules so I can play to win. Hopefully these lessons will up the ante. (Did I mention these were not a result of the 'hard knock school of life lessons'? It was pretty fun along the way).
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)